Comments on: Heroes 3.13 ‘DUEL’ extended preview

By: Jay

Jay — Tue, 30 Dec 2008 02:50:41 +0000

Nathan is evil, I wouldn’t state so if that last comment to Peter didn’t take place – It was stone cold.

and Nathan obviously cared more about Claire and Peter than Power in season 1, look at how he sacrificed himself – Also look at the mess he became in seasn 2 after “losing” Peter.

Also, when Peter died to sylar in season 1, Nathan was in a right state and said “The elections off Ma… it doesn’t matter anymore” (If I’m not mistaken)

Anyways, I can’t wait for Volume 4!

By: Eric

Eric — Sun, 28 Dec 2008 03:10:00 +0000

Many of you are questioning whether Nathan is “evil”. He is not quote evil but he is the bad guy now for sure because he is the one who has made all the fugitives and is gonna cause all them to be captured or die. He turned on his own kind and there is no way he can come back from that. What make heroes such as good show is because nobody is all good or all bad like most superhero stories, they are human and “grey characters”. Nathan will probably feel guilty for all the damage he’s done and in the last episode of a season or maybe of the whole show he will sacrifice his life for something heroic in the end. If you think about it Nathan has been following the path to lead villian the whole series whether he likes it or not he can’t avoid his destiny. The plan has been good brother vs bad brother the whole time. Heroes just does a good job of making you understand why and how people become what they do. He was supposed to be president in season 1, he’s always cared more about himself and power than he cared about his daughter Claire or anything even Peter who was the closest person in his life.
The question I got is if he told the government he has abilities or that his family does???

And PLEASE bring back Claude, Hana, Charles Deveaux, Susan Amman, Paula Gamble, Harry Fletcher, and Carlos Mendez. I love the characters with experience and the old Company stories. I wanna see some flashbacks of the company founders and the things they did when they formed their powerful union under Adam!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By: Destruction

Destruction — Thu, 25 Dec 2008 23:24:05 +0000

Volume #3 to me is way better than volume #2 .. it had that volume #1 feeling towards the ending of it .. hopefully volume #4 can up lift all the hopes i had for volume #2. I like the show .. i dont care what they do with it as long as they keep Peter and HRG in the show im good .. they are my favs .. but ill take any direction they go .. as long as its still Heroes .. Sylar is very important too .. but i know eventually he will die as all villians must .. Hopefully in the last season finale .. the showdown .. Peter vs Sylar .. we all know thats how we first saw it .. but hopefully in a couple more years .. i love this show to much to end it now .. even though i heard they only planned a 5 season show .. but with possibilities of more depending on ratings .. just dont cancel the show .. let it go out in style with the face off of a lifetime or timeline?

By: tomiwa

tomiwa — Thu, 25 Dec 2008 21:57:57 +0000

nathan shud not b bad.tthey shud bring up a nicestoryline with a little less power exhibition like season 1…cos with d way things r goin heroes will soon b lyk d x-men.rubbish

By: tomiwa

tomiwa — Thu, 25 Dec 2008 21:57:22 +0000

i think the writer is runnin out of stories…really affectin d show.heroes s kinda confusin now.some episodes make u think of wat is ryt 2 u.lots of guesses n arguements…annoyin.
i think the finales go down.season 1 s d best n season 2 s better than season 3.
the idea of nathan bein a villian s disappointin.why not mohinder or ando feelin bad n superchargin some lowlifes with weak abilities n formin a league or since season 4 s called fugitives…d government ll make dem[with abilities] feel lyk rebels n sylar ll work 4 dem[maybe his father s well respected n connected...badly rich].nathan was d hero of season 1 no doubt…actually d only hero.how does hiro stabin sylar makes him a hero,or peter punchin sylar.if nathan had not come new york wud be gone or if claire shot peter imagine heroes without peter.

By: Jebus

Jebus — Thu, 25 Dec 2008 01:31:05 +0000

Hes terrible.

By: Moahha

Moahha — Wed, 24 Dec 2008 12:40:24 +0000

Ok thanks hor your opinion sylar is back and jay. Does anyone else have a opinion?

By: Sylar is Back

Sylar is Back — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 21:51:10 +0000

he seems constipated at times. but he is ok for the part. i dont know who else could play peter.

By: Jay

Jay — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:39:45 +0000

In season 1 he was brilliant, volume 2 & 3 its been abit choppy, but alright.

By: Moahha

Moahha — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:35:59 +0000

This question isn’t about heroes. It is about milo ventimiglia who plays peter petrelli. I personally love him and think he is a great actor but the people i talk to about him says that he only is a ok if not bad actor… So i was wondering, wht do you guys think?

By: jay

jay — Sat, 20 Dec 2008 02:45:31 +0000

Thing is, does Nathan even have access to those drugs? or even know what they are? were they specifically made by the Company for the Company?

and even then – Sylar was drugged up and managed to escape the cell Peter put him in.

By: Noah Baudee

Noah Baudee — Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:29:28 +0000

> Does nathan really think Peter, Peter or Sylar can’t escape a government facility?

Sure. Pump them up with tranquilizers or other drugs that prevent them from concentrating and they can’t use their abilities.

By: jay

jay — Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:29:22 +0000

Peter, Hiro and Sylar*

By: jay

jay — Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:28:56 +0000

Some things bothering me.

Does nathan really think Peter, Peter or Sylar can’t escape a government facility? lol – I know hiro doesn’t have time travel atm, but Nathan clearly doesn’t know that being as he gave Hiro’s profile to the President.

If he thinks Hiro still has time travel, he should think Peter can reacquire it.

Another thing – thats not Peters scar – its simply on his cheek whilst his other scar went straight from one side of the face, over the nose and around the eye, to the other side of his forehead.

Regarding who’s peter running from in volume3 ep 1 – Thats the Haitian, its clear he and claire were partners, and thats how he couldn’t fly / run super fast and so on away. (Also justifies why he was running away, any other scrub he would have just overthrown)

I hope Nathans “evil ness” is explained in depth because its not cutting it for me – There needs to be a huge reason for it being triggered because he actually sacrificed himself in Season 1 for Peter – and in Season 2 he was big time depressed from Peters “departure”

I recall a scene where Nathans speaking with Peter in season 1 saying such things like “I don’t know what I am without you”

and now, the last line he said was (after peter saving him) “It’s not what I would have done”

It better get explained!

By: Destruction

Destruction — Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:03:31 +0000

All i have to say on the Nathan being bad is .. Good! .. the future is happening .. peter’s scar .. nathan being politically involved (although he’s just Senator now .. he will become the president im sure) .. i hope in turn to see maybe Peter leaving to the past this next volume .. although i heard they were going to stay away from the time travelling thing for a while .. I agree with Tracy being gone from the show .. her charater is useless and boring .. i liked that they showed Micah .. i liked him in season 1 and thought he could be used again .. wouldnt mind seeing him in Vol. 4 .. But i feel something has to happen that will cause people to forget about the “special people” .. maybe a supercharged ando at the end of the volume hits the haitian and he is able to erase the incident from people’s mind .. or maybe they will go back and change it once more .. but i can see them leaving it like everyone in the world knows about these special people and its just “kool” with everyone .. and i also want to see why or who peter was running from in the beginning of vol. 3 .. and does that mean that the future with sylar happen as well .. or did that change due to the circumstances of what happened after peter took sylars abilities .. which in my opinion why they took them away in the first place .. to start from the begining with peter and his abilities .. Sylar will be in swat gear this next volume .. is that what his dad does? .. or is it part of some sceme to grab another ability or kill one of his archenemies (peter, HRG, claire) i personally like the WTF they made me do this season .. lots of things i tought they’d include which they didn’t and lots of stuff i thought they’d never get back to which they did .. i think they tried to much in so little time that they will just stick to what has worked so far .. let me point is out

1. Sylar is bad!!! .. they tried to show u a past, present and future with him good .. everyone hated it and wanted sylar as the main villian for the show .. so sylar is bad!!

2. People like powers .. they took Hiro’s, Claire’s and most importantly Peter’s and Sylar’s powers away from them .. the three main charaters .. and even though it made for a few suspensefull episodes .. they sucked and we couldn’t wait from the powers to return ..

3. They always included another villan besides sylar .. Vol.1 was Linderman .. Vol.2 was Adam Monroe .. Vol.3 was Arthur and Vol.4 wont be Nathan but the government

These things work .. stick with that .. not sure how Hiro will get his powers back but .. I’m tired of them making Hiro such a goof ball .. he saves the world but its almost like by accident .. Hiro has pontenial .. he lacks confidence and focus .. something that i hope he’ll gain in the furture .. (i remember furture Hiro from Vol.1) really hopes he turns into his future self .. So Ando could have been supercharging Hiro for something instead of killing him .. so many questions so little answers and almost no time .. this has been my 2 cents

By: jay

jay — Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:26:25 +0000

No, Nathan is evil – Sure he believes hes “protecting the world”

But its idiocy that he does this by giving AMERICAN TROOPS the formula – Thats just powering up 1 side of the several, and besides that – I recall him saying to Peter after having his life saved “It’s not what I would have done.”

That was stone cold, and more than enough proof the guy is evil :p

Comparing his action in the second half of this volume to the previous too – It doesn’t fit.

The only reasons for this could be one of the following;

Peter shot him, even if it was a “Future Peter” – Might have triggered some mental breakdown – Another would be that he died, and was resurrected by Peter unknowingly – Could have changed him, being “reborn” and all.

Unless those are the causes of his recent personality change, I’d personally draw it up as bad writing and the overall destruction of a brilliant fictional character!

By: Kev

Kev — Thu, 18 Dec 2008 07:29:20 +0000

Nathan isn’t “evil”. The villains tend to know they’re villains. Nathan believes what he’s doing is best for the world. Even if it is the wrong choice

By: jay

jay — Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:36:13 +0000

Would powering up Peter allow him to absorb anyone’s ability who is within say, a 100 mile radius? ^^

By: CKH

CKH — Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:09:56 +0000

@CorrosionX
haha, yeah, Ando is now officially the super sidekick, he can power up whoever he is with

By: Christian Philippsen

Christian Philippsen — Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:03:46 +0000

@Noah Baudee – Interesting theori you’ve got going… Maybe your right about the supercharging of Hiro in the future.